Coarse particle retention testing on a ball mill at Lundin’s Eagle Mine Humboldt concentrator

You are here: Resources / Coarse particle retention testing on a ball mill at Lundin’s Eagle Mine Humboldt concentrator

McIvor, Bartholomew, Arafat, Daavettila, Savola

Presented at the AusIMM Mill Operators Conference June 2021

ABSTRACT

Ball mill media sizing investigations were carried out for the ball mill circuits grinding minus 12.5mm crushing plant product at Lundin’s Eagle Mine base metal concentrator in Humboldt, Michigan, USA. Batch grinding tests were carried out on mill feed with a torque-metered pilot mill with the same ball charge sizing (76mmtop size) as used in the plant.

Calculated grinding rates of the coarsest particles were approximately four times higher for the plant mill than the pilot mill. One explanation is that coarser particles are retained in the continuous plant mill longer and thus exposed to more energy. This challenged the assumption used in population balance modelling that particles of all sizes, as well as the liquid, have the same residence time, as characterised by liquid tracer tests.

A literature review revealed that this assumption is false, and that residence time as a function of particle size is not able to be determined precisely. To explore this further, a plant test was carried out by dosing a mill with 16–22mm particles, coarser than any in the normal circuit feed, in conjunction with liquid residence tracing using salt and a conductivity probe. The test showed that the coarse particles were retained approximately twice as long as the liquid. It also showed that abrasion of these particles is contributing significantly to their size reduction

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge Lundin Mining for allowing them to conduct and publish the results of this test. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support of ME Elecmetal in the general development of the media size improvement program which prompted this study

AUTHORS

RE McIvor1, KM Bartholomew2, O Arafat3, S Daavettila4and E Savola5

1.Chief Metallurgist, Metcom Technologies Inc, Grand Rapids, Minnesota, USA 55744. Email:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

2.Senior Metallurgist, Metcom TechnologiesInc, Grand Rapids, Minnesota, USA 55744. Email:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

3.Project MetallurgistandBusiness Development Manager, Metcom TechnologiesInc,Grand Rapids, Minnesota, USA 55744. Email:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

4.Mill Metallurgist, Eagle Mine, Champion, Michigan, USA 49814. Email:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

5.Lead Metallurgical Technician, Eagle Mine, Champion, Michigan, USA 49814. Email:This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

If you are interested in purchasing proceedings or abstracts, please use this link.

Categories

0